foreverloveme

Jun 10

This spring’s roller coaster ride of corn and soybean
planting took a huge step toward completion over the last
week, as farmers made major progress getting their corn
and soybeans in the ground, according to Tuesday’s USDA-
NASS Crop Progress report.

U.S. farmers made a 21% gain planting soybeans over the
last 7 days, up to 74%. Though that’s still 1% off the
previous average, farmers in many large soybean-growing
states made some of the largest strides. In Missouri, 48%
of the crop was in the ground as of Sunday, compared to
22% a week ago and, in Illinois, 73% of the beans are sown
compared to 47% a week ago.

After starting off on a brisk pace, corn planting was
slowed by moisture through much of May. But, the last week
of the month treated farmers better, allowing many to see
the finish line. Farmers in all 18 of the major corn-
growing states saw progress advance into the 90s, with
those in Minnesota and North Carolina finished planting.
Emergence is ahead of the normal pace thus far, with 85%
of the crop poked through compared to the 80% previous 5-
year average. Soybean emergence, at 46%, is just ahead of
the normal clip.

But, the numbers don’t tell the whole story. There’s a lot
more variability in planting progress than what USDA
reported Tuesday, farmers say. “Crop conditions vary a lot
around here as well. Some of us were able to get corn in
around the 20th of April and that corn looks good for the
most part. Corn that was planted after the rains started
setting in seem a little stunted,” says Agriculture.com
Marketing Talk member BKsandFarmer. “I was hoping it would
stay dry another day so I could replant some bean acres
flooded out a couple weeks ago, but it’s raining now. If
the weather pattern stays the same, it may be a challenge
to spray this year. Like most guys, I won’t curse the rain
just yet.”

Replanting soybeans is also on Marketing Talk member
jdmcfarm1′s schedule after he had 600 acres get nipped by
frost and flooded out. “Unless they were planted way too
early, the cold and wet of early May destroyed them here,”
he says.

Jun 08

About 1 million tons in Algiers Algerian barley 5 port of shipment sold to the international market. This is the north big grain imports in Algeria 43 first export of barley.

State radio quoted Algerian state grain, the general manager of words, a nur 1.1 million tons of French buyers to purchase barley in the price of $140 tons per shipment to Tunisia.

The official said that over the next few years, Algeria plans to export of barley. At present, Algeria barley reserves can meet the demand of domestic 2 years.

However, from France, Spain and Canada wheat, barley of Algerian exports is still low. Official figures show that by 2010 for four months, Algeria grain imports lower than the same period last year, but still amounted to 6.4% 194.5 tons.

The 2008-2009 agricultural season, Algeria grain harvest, grain output reached 61 tons, barley 240 tons.

In South Africa, Algeria Mediterranean area ranked second in Africa. According to Algeria 2010-2014 new five-year plan, the country will be spending heavily to develop agriculture.

May 20

Agricultural Research Service (ARS) scientists are tapping into the biochemistry of one of the world’s most damaging insect pests to develop a biocontrol agent that may keep the pest away from gardens and farms.

Aphids spread diseases that cost gardeners and farmers hundreds of millions of dollars each year. Some of the insecticides available are not environmentally friendly, and because aphids are developing insecticide resistance, some growers are being forced to use more of the chemicals.

Ronald J. Nachman, a chemist with the ARS Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center at College Station, Texas, is working with chemical signals known as neuropeptides that aphids and other organisms use to control and regulate a wide range of body functions, such as digestion, respiration, water intake and excretions. The effect triggered by the chemical signal is normally turned off when the neuropeptide is broken down by enzymes in the body. Nachman is developing neuropeptide mimics, or analogues, with slightly altered molecular structures that will not break down. His goal is to kill the pest by disrupting its digestion, water intake or some other biological function.

Nachman, along with Guy Smagghe of Ghent University in Belgium and other colleagues, mixed five candidate analogues into dietary solutions and fed each one to 20 caged pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum) nymphs. The scientists found that one of the formulations killed 90 to 100 percent of the aphids within three days, at a rate and potency comparable to insecticides now on the market. The study was recently published in the journal Peptides.

Any biocontrol agent would have to be thoroughly tested before being released for commercial use. Nachman is continuing to test and evaluate the neuropeptide mimics. But he said the molecular structures of the class of neuropeptide he is studying, known as insect kinins, are so unique that such a biocontrol agent is unlikely to have any effect on humans, plants or other types of organisms.

ARS is the principal intramural scientific research agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). The research supports the USDA priority of promoting international food security.

May 19

Kansas State University ag economist Art Barnaby compares USDA’s ACRE program to buying a put option on state revenue. The cost of the option is giving up 20% of your direct payment. And there’s basis risk, too. Even if revenue in your state falls the required 10% and triggers payments, your farm might not get a cent unless it, too, has at least a small drop in revenue.

Friday, Barnaby and fellow K-State economist Troy Dumler held a webinar on ACRE with the latest projections for payments on 2010 crops as well as 2009. Their handicapping comes out a little more than two weeks before the June 1 deadline to enroll in the program for 2010 through 2012. The Average Crop Revenue Election is optional, and producers will have two more years to try it if they decide to stay in the direct and counter-cyclical payment program.

Barnaby emphasized that his latest projections aren’t a prediction. Farmers still haven’t gotten any payments on 2009 crops from ACRE and won’t until this fall. Any payments on 2010 crops would be based on yields on planted acres and national marketing year average prices that will be known in the fall of 2011.

“We are actually talking about prices that are 18 months out in the future,” Barnaby said. “At best, it’s a shot in the dark but you have to start somewhere.”

Barnaby uses 30-year trendline yields for each state and current futures prices and basis to calculate a national average price under current conditions. That gives him a potential state revenue on crops that are just now being planted, or in the case of winter wheat, maturing.

Then he subtracts it from each state’s benchmark, That’s calculated by first averaging the previous two year’s prices, 2008 and 2009 (a marketing year almost over for wheat and ending August 31 for corn and beans). Then that average price is multiplied by each state’s Olympic average yield. (That’s calculated from the previous five years of yields, throwing out the high and low years and averaging the remaining three.)

Doing all that gives Barnaby a list of states that are “in the money” on ACRE payments, or likely to get payments if today’s market conditions are the same 18 months out. Many of those calculations resulted in states that are out of the money, and unlikely to get payments.

Using a $3.57 price for corn, Barnaby projects only one state, South Dakota, getting ACRE payments, at the state level rate of $9.75 an acre. It’s a similar story for soybeans: Mississippi is the only in-the-money state, with a projected state ACRE payment of $6.76 an acre. With almost half of last year’s wheat crop still in the bin and prices depressed, more ACRE payments are likely. Barnaby projects 23 states collecting payments, with North Carolina’s the largest, at $74.28 an acre.

“In-the-money options are more likely to pay, but not always,” Barnaby cautioned.

Last August, when farmers had a chance to sign up for ACRE starting with 2009 crops, corn payments appeared likely in many states. In Iowa, for example, “at signup a year ago that option was deep in the money, at $81.89,” Barnaby recalled. “The fact is, that option is likely to expire worthless.” Most Corn Belt states harvested better-than-expected yields and also saw prices rise at the same time, an unusual occurrence. Only Illinois had lower yields, and is likely to collect corn payments on the 2009 crop.

During questions, Barnaby was asked if he thought anyone signing up for ACRE would be affected by its other requirement beyond a 205 cut in direct payments. Enrolling in ACRE also requires accepting a 30% drop in the loan rate, meaning prices would have to fall below that new level to trigger loan deficiency payments.

Barnaby said it’s unlikely on major program crops like corn and soybeans. Corn prices are supported by the fact that USDA expects 4.6 billion bushels to be used to make ethanol.

“What would get us down to the loan rate, as I said, is a change in ethanol policy,” Barnaby said. Right now, the equivalent of two Iowa corn crops is winding up in the nation’s gas tanks, he said.

May 18

  Inside clouds or on ice sheets in Antarctica, iron oxide dust particles embedded in ice crystals may reduce quickly into a form needed by phytoplankton, a new study reports. This bioavailable iron fuels algal photosynthesis, which pulls carbon dioxide from the atmosphere into the oceans, an important process in regulating climate.

  Phytoplankton use iron in the active sites of their photosynthetic and nitrogen-fixing proteins. Phytoplankton can’t access iron oxides in the insoluble Fe(III) oxidation state, but they can grab the more soluble Fe(II) oxidation state.

  Most of the oceans’ iron starts as mineral dust blown from deserts. This dust mostly contains Fe(III), which can transform to Fe(II) when a photon-excited electron reduces it. The electron comes either from an iron oxide particle’s conduction band or from an organic acid ligand.

  After working at the Korean Polar Research Institute’s Dasan station in Ny-Alesund, Norway, environmental photochemist Wonyong Choi, of Pohang University of Science and Technology, in South Korea, hypothesized that ice might influence this process.

  ”In polar regions, the sun constantly irradiates the surface for six months and most of the ground is covered in ice and snow,” he says. “So I wondered what kind of unique chemistry might happen in that environment.”

  In his laboratory in South Korea, Choi and his co-workers compared the photoreduction of iron oxides trapped in ice to that of particles suspended in liquid water. They irradiated both samples with ultraviolet light for 48 hours in the presence of formic acid, an organic acid common in cloud water droplets. The researchers then observed greater than 10 times more Fe(II) ions in the ice than in liquid water. In a similar comparison using natural sunlight outside the Ny-Alesund station, they found that ice enhanced photoreduction about five-fold over liquid water (Environ. Sci. Technol. DOI: 10.1021/es9037808).

  Photoreduction may occur more quickly in ice, the scientists propose, because of a concentration effect. As water freezes, it pushes iron oxide particles and organic acids out of the ordered ice lattice and concentrates them into narrow channels between ice crystals called grain boundary regions. Even at freezing temperatures, these regions remain liquid-like. By bringing iron oxide particles closer to electron donors, such as organic acids or other iron oxide particles, Choi says, ice makes charge transfer more efficient.

  Ice’s role in iron photoreduction “certainly isn’t anything anyone else talked about before,” says William G. Sunda, a marine biogeochemist at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Beaufort Laboratories, in North Carolina. Because phytoplankton depend on bioavailable iron to absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, understanding how ice affects photoreduction could help scientists model the influence of algal photosynthesis on climate change, especially in the Southern Ocean where iron is limiting.

  Also, Sunda says, ice loss in polar regions caused by warmer global temperatures could lead to less iron present in its bioavailable form. That shrinkage, in turn, could slow phytoplankton growth and disrupt climate regulation. But Choi warns that he and his colleagues have yet to confirm that this laboratory mechanism has importance in the environment. Until then, he hesitates to speculate about any implications for climate change.

May 17

A changing game

A decade ago, glyphosate was well on its way to becoming the only game in town in the soybean herbicide market. The nonselective herbicide obliterated nearly all weeds while sparing Roundup Ready soybeans. Any glyphosate-resistant weeds were just a gleam in a weed’s genome.

That’s changed. Today, glyphosate resistance has been confirmed among 10 species in 23 states. Other weeds are requiring higher rates of glyphosate for effective control. Continual use of glyphosate has also shifted weed populations in some areas.

“My observation driving around the state (Iowa) last summer is that we have a boatload of fields becoming increasingly weedy despite the best efforts that we have,” says Mike Owen, Iowa State University Extension weed specialist.

It’s the same case for other states. “The consistency of glyphosate is not as good as it used to be,” adds Aaron Hager, University of Illinois Extension weed specialist.

“My prediction is that glyphosate will be driven to redundancy in large parts of North America and South America,” says Stephen Powles, professor and director of the Western Australia Herbicide Resistance Initiative at the University of Western Australia.

Particularly disconcerting are the weeds resistant to multiple modes of action. In Illinois, a quad stack of a common waterhemp biotype has been confirmed with resistance to the following action modes:

* Triazines (atrazine)
* ALS inhibitors (imazethapyr, active ingredient in Pursuit)
* PPO inhibitors (lactofen, the active ingredient in Cobra)
* Glycines (glyphosate)

Other modes of action

But, chin up. Sure, resistance to glyphosate and other modes of action exists. Still, glyphosate will remain a cornerstone of row-crop weed control, says Owen.

“Glyphosate is the world’s greatest herbicide,” adds Powles. “It is a one-in-100-year discovery. It is right up there with penicillin for humans in terms of discovery. We should do everything we can to keep it.”

Glyphosate-resistant weeds are spawning several new complementary herbicides and alternative herbicides. Last year, for example, farmers were able to apply glufosinate in a LibertyLink soybean system. New traits and herbicide active ingredients can help squelch any single and multiple mode of action weeds.

It’s important, though, to retain proper stewardship for all herbicide modes of action. Powles says if glufosinate-tolerant systems replaced all current glyphosate-tolerant systems across North and South America, weed resistance would eventually develop to glufosinate.

“We have to recognize that herbicides are precious resources,” he says.

One new stable of products containing a new active ingredient is Kixor from BASF. This herbicide concept will cover several brand names. This will be the first growing season in which farmers will be able to apply it.

“The active ingredient is saflufenacil,” says Owen. “It’s a new herbicide family, but it is a PPO inhibitor, an older mode of action.”

May 14

  KOSCIUSKO – The hydrangeas that were mainstays in grandma’s yard are making a comeback, and Mississippi State University research may help commercial growers shed production problems.

  Hydrangeas are an important crop for commercial growers in many states and could gain ground in Mississippi greenhouses because of Guihong Bi’s cultivation study. A research horticulturist with the Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, Bi said many greenhouses and nurseries could use this information to diversify their operations and perhaps improve the overall quality of their stock.

  “The knowledge obtained from this research can help growers decrease their production costs, reduce their nitrogen fertilizer inputs, minimize nitrogen runoff, improve plant quality and possibly improve grower profits,” Bi said.

  Hydrangeas are a group of ornamental shrubs prized for their large flowerheads and long stems. One of the more popular species is Hydrangea macrophylla, commonly known as the florist hydrangea. The flowers can vary from white to various shades of blue, pink, red and purple. The ability of the plants to absorb aluminum in the soil can affect the color of non-white flowers.

  Consumers often buy hydrangeas for Valentine’s Day, Easter and Mother’s Day. To have them ready for sale, growers use a process called forcing. Growers manipulate the plants to obtain blooms within a marketing window by controlling their growth with different treatments, including leaf shed, or defoliation, cold storage and forcing in the greenhouse.

  Bi’s goals were to develop methods to promote defoliation without affecting nutrient storage and to identify a fertilization program that reduces excessive vegetative growth, allows plants to use nitrogen efficiently and improves flowering performance. She consulted with several greenhouse operators on the project.

  “Dr. Bi sees what we are trying to do, and she puts together a protocol that addresses some of the problems we have in our production,” said Mark Terkanian, general manager of Natchez Trace Greenhouses in Kosciusko. “I’m a grower, and she is the scientist. It keeps us both on track to solve problems.”

  Natchez Trace Greenhouses is now producing dormant hydrangea plants, instead of buying them from the West Coast. Terkanian said he has seen demand for hydrangeas increase in the last five years with no sign of slowing down.

  “It costs more than $5 per plant to ship dormant hydrangeas from the West Coast,” he said. “You can see why we needed an alternative to buying dormant plants.”

  The labor-intensive process to produce hydrangeas at Terkanian’s facility starts in April. Terkanian buys unrooted cuttings from Oregon and plants them in containers. The plants are placed in greenhouses or shaded fields to develop their root systems and go through summer’s vegetative growth phase.

  The plants start to develop flower buds in late summer and autumn before they are placed into a cooler. This cold storage phase takes from six to 10 weeks. The hydrangeas are then taken out of the cooler and placed in the greenhouse for forcing into bloom.

  Terkanian was interested in minimizing production time and cost. He invited Bi to use his facility for her experiment with chemical defoliants and foliar fertilization sprays.

  “As a grower, I want to know how things work, particularly if we want to mimic the natural blooming process for hydrangeas,” he said.

  In her experiment, Bi treated plants with different rates of nitrogen during their vegetative growth in summer. She applied different chemical defoliants and nitrogen fertilizers in the fall.

  Bi is the first researcher to investigate the effectiveness of foliar urea applications in fall, either before the chemical defoliants are applied or in conjunction with defoliant applications on growth and flowering performance of florist hydrangeas.

  Initial results have indicated that some treatments do not visibly injure plants but actually improve their ability to store nitrogen for bloom development during forcing.

  “The information from the study also may apply to other greenhouse and nursery crops,” she said. “However, the response of plants to defoliants and fertilization practices is affected by many variables, and growers should conduct proper testing before incorporating any method into production practices.”